Upper Fort (British c. 1796 -
1826) |
EAST FORT GATE PROJECT
|
Following the first British occupation of S.A., Major General James Craig embarked on a program of upgrading the defences of the Peninsula, as they feared an attempt by either France or the Netherlands to re-take the Cape. East and West Fort had successfully deterred an attack by the British in 1795 but it was doubtful that the defences, as they stood, could withstand a determined attack from a belligerent well equipped force. Inadequately protected, the Bay could provide a safe anchorage and fresh water for an invading fleet, thus at the time when Napoleon's power was on the ascendance, Hout Bay was seen as the "soft underbelly" of Cape Town. Craig's decision to strengthen the Peninsula's defences was therefore timely and understandable. It is likely that Craig was also directly responsible for the construction c.1796 of the King's, York, Queen's and Prince of Wales Block Houses. In addition he built the "Martello Tower" in Simonstown. |
|
|
|
| Could the Blockhouse be restored? Left:- Viewed from the mountain side are the remains of the 1796 blockhouse built by the British. The entire ground floor consisting of the magazine and water cistern remain intact and part of the middle level. However, the original drawings of the building are available as can be seen below. This means that there is a strong possibility that the building could be restored to its original splendor being a unique example military architecture of the day. The blockhouse would be used to house interpretive displays and artifacts relative to the military history of the site. It would also have an unparalleled viewpoint from the roof for photographers and whale watchers. The Blockhouse will be very prominent when viewed from Hout Bay and it will be a fine place to fly the South African Flag as well as well as others on special occasions. |
|
DWG 1 |
DWG 1 Opposite: The two elevations opposite clearly show the three stories of the Block House as it was originally designed by the military architects of the Royal Engineers, though it was actually built by a local contractor. The upper story had wooden balconies which were cantilevered outwards such that they could fire muskets directly below them should attackers manage to reach the fort. The lower floor contained the magazine for the storage of gunpowder and on the left of the LH elevation a water cistern. The middle floor would appear to have had a fireplace and chimney for the chilly winter nights when the North Wester chilled the soldiers on guard to the bone. |
DWG2 Opposite: The plans on the left show the layout of each floor, the left most one showing the ground floor more or less as it is today, the upper stories having been destroyed intentionally or suffered the ravages of time. The structure would have depended to some extent for its stability on wooden joists between the floors which would have had a relatively short lifetime. The stonework was not "dressed" as would have been done by experienced stone masons and the mortar of the time would have had limited strength as it was built almost 100 years before portland cement was first used in the Colony. |
DWG2 |
|
What other evidence is available to help reconstruct the
Blockhouse? |
The "Battle of Hout
Bay". |
|